What is Reentrancy Attack?

A reentrancy attack is a security problem with smart contracts that causes the attacker to repeatedly call that function until the contract hasn’t updated its internal state. When a contract invokes an external contract, an external contract invokes a call back to the initial function before all should get completed. This is how the attacker can use this flaw to withdraw more funds of the same or do unintended things again and again, taking away the contract’s resources or assets.

Key Concepts of Reentrancy Attack

Reentrancy attacks utilize how a contract interacts with an external contract. An external contract called to by a contract when it sends funds to an external address tends to get its callback before being fully updated inside its internal state. Let’s say in a function that handles fund withdrawals if you update the balance in the function after a transaction is complete, an attacker can call the function multiple times and withdraw more funds than intended and the balance won’t be updated.

As the contract itself doesn’t update its internal state before making an external call, the attacker’s window of opportunity is created. The problem can happen when the contract logic is not careful enough to do sending funds or perform actions but update the key state variables such as balances first. Smart contracts that interact often with external smart contracts or rely on external contract interaction to fulfill their functions are especially vulnerable.

Secure coding practices called checks-effects-interactions are used to prevent reentrancy attacks. This approach guarantees that before any interaction with external contracts a condition gets checked and the internal contract state gets updated. Even if an external contract delivers a message to the original contract, the attack is prevented by having secured the internal state by doing so.

Advantages of Reentrancy Attack

Reentrancy attacks are efficient from an attacker’s perspective as they work against the lack of safeguards of the contract logic rather than the blockchain itself. The attack can then be automated once the target contract becomes vulnerable, the attack can be executed quickly, and financially gain as well.

In particular highly valued contracts that control large amounts of cryptocurrency (i.e. in the USDC and dai arena) are especially prone to reentrancy attacks. While the blockchain is immutable, the attacker can make the attack extremely lucrative by the fact the funds are withdrawn, and the attacker can secure them permanently.

Disadvantages and Considerations

The portable nature and nominal cost of sensor networks allow these networks to be rapidly deployed and updated, and their flexibility (e.g. their programmability) enables assets to be re-used for multiple applications.

There are several challenges and many risks involved with reentrancy attacks for attackers. At the central risk, blockchain transactions are highly transparent. As with everything, the public ledger records every action allowing developers and security teams to watch the attack unfold in real time. Stopping the attack probably wouldn’t happen on the spot, but action could be swift enough to save a portion of it. That stopped further losses, and developers might be able to pause the contract in between or apply emergency fixes.

Another problem for attackers is reentrancy vulnerabilities are becoming less and less common. As more and more developers follow security audits while adopting better coding practices, fewer and fewer contracts are left vulnerable. Even now, most smart contracts of today are regularly audited and tested with it being unlikely that reentrancy bugs were previously overlooked.

The challenge for developers is that they don’t want to get hit with reentrancy vulnerabilities by not following best practices on smart contracts. It’s one of the most critical measures in preventing re-entrance is to ensure that before its external calls, the contract updates its state. Furthermore, developers need to ensure that their contracts don’t have vulnerabilities they can hunt and fix before launch so that they aren’t exploited.

Attackers are also at legal risk. While blockchain is a decentralized system, investigators can trace stolen funds through exchanges or off-chain entities that require identification and therefore make legal consequences for attackers more likely.

Common Use Cases for Reentrancy Attack

Mostly, reentrancy attacks have targeted decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms in which large amounts of assets are managed through smart contracts. For example, the 2016 DAO hack featured a reentrancy vulnerability which allowed attackers to empty the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) of Ether. As a result, this attack caused a hard fork that performed a split of the Ethereum network into Ethereum and Ethereum Classic.

Lending, borrowing, and trading are all common targets because these are other DeFi platforms that involve complex financial interactions (i.e. transferring assets between multiple contracts). When reentrancy happens by exploiting a method that doesn’t deal with these transfers securely, you lose tons of money.

Yield farming protocols of the type where users stake assets to earn rewards are also susceptible to reentrancy attacks. With this feature, an attacker can repeatedly say they have obtained a reward before the contract updates the balance and siphons off rewards that should have been shared among all users equally.

Conclusion

Reentrancy attacks attack smart contracts in that. They allow exploiters to call functions before that internal state is updated. These attacks can be extremely lucrative if the coding is not too good, with good coding practices becoming less common as blockchain developers adopt better methods to make things secure.

This means that careful design of the contract is required, which in many cases can be documented using the standard 'checks-effects-interactions' pattern. Regular security audits and testing also are needed to discover and expunge flaws before uncovering the security hole. While reentrancy attacks are dangerous and are indeed still a thing to be worried about, the blockchain community is consistently evolving and learning to do better security practices that work to reduce reentrancy attacks, but not eliminate them.

Reentrancy Attack

Key Concepts of Reentrancy Attack

Advantages of Reentrancy Attack

Disadvantages and Considerations

Common Use Cases for Reentrancy Attack

Conclusion

Related Articals